California Top Court to Decide on Retailer Defibrillator Issue
Are large California retailers required to have a device on hand to treat customers who fall victim to sudden cardiac arrest?
The California Supreme Court is taking up that question during oral arguments.
At issue is a Southern California family’s wrongful death lawsuit against Target stores. Mary Ann Verdugo died of cardiac arrest in 2008 in a Pico Rivera Target store.
Her family argues that her life might have been saved had the store had an automatic external defibrillator on hand to shock her heart back to beating. Target and its allies argue that requiring retailers to do anything more than call 911 during medical emergencies is an unfair and expensive burden.
The court has 90 days to rule.
Copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Today
- New York Governor Hochul Vows to Tackle Insurance Affordability, Litigation and Fraud
- Wildfires, Storms Fuel 2025 Insured Losses of $108 Billion: Munich Re Report
- Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to $2.46B Boy Scouts Sex Abuse Settlement
- Adjusters Launch ‘CarFax for Insurance Claims’ to Vet Carriers’ Damage Estimates