Arizona Law On Medical Malpractice Suits Upheld
A new Arizona Supreme Court ruling upholds a state law that seeks to screen out flimsy medical-malpractice suits by requiring that plaintiffs have a testifying witness from the same medical specialty as the doctor being sued.
The court’s unanimous ruling issued Tuesday says the requirement makes it more difficult to file medical-malpractice suits but is not unconstitutional because the requirement doesn’t flatly prevent plaintiffs from having their day in court.
The ruling was issued in a case from Tucson in which a University Physicians Healthcare doctor was sued. The doctor was sued by the father of a 17-year-old girl who died from blood clots after being hospitalized for other blood clots.
The Supreme Court’s ruling sends the case back down to trial court for further proceedings.
- Fla. Regulators’ Effort to Remove Insurer Execs May Not Pass Constitutional Muster
- Growing Wildfire Risk Leaves States Grappling With How to Keep Insurers From Fleeing
- Insurer Chubb Readies $350M Payout Tied to Baltimore Bridge Collapse
- Insurtechs Root, Lemonade Book Q1 Net Income Losses but Each Tout Progress