McDonald’s Ordered to Face Byron Allen’s $10B Discrimination Lawsuit
McDonald’s Corp. has been ordered by a U.S. judge to defend against media entrepreneur Byron Allen’s $10 billion lawsuit accusing the fast-food chain of “racial stereotyping” by not advertising with Black-owned media.
Allen accused McDonald’s of relegating his Entertainment Studios Networks Inc and Weather Group LLC, which owns the Weather Channel, to an “African American tier” with a separate ad agency and much smaller ad budget, depriving them of tens of millions of dollars of annual revenue.
While not ruling on the merits, Olguin cited allegations that Entertainment Studios had since its 2009 founding tried repeatedly and unsuccessfully to obtain a contract from McDonald’s, whose “racist” corporate culture harmed Allen.
“Taken together, and construed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts to support an inference of intentional discrimination,” Olguin wrote.
In a statement on Tuesday, McDonald’s lawyer Loretta Lynch maintained that the Chicago-based company viewed the lawsuit as “about revenue, not race,” and believed the evidence would show there was no discrimination.
“Plaintiffs’ groundless allegations ignore both McDonald’s legitimate business reasons for not investing more on their channels and the company’s long-standing business relationships with many other diverse-owned partners,” she said.
Allen, in a statement, said the case was “about economic inclusion of African American-owned businesses in the U.S. economy. McDonald’s takes billions from African American consumers and gives almost nothing back.”
The lawsuit said Blacks represent 40% of fast food customers, but McDonald’s spent just 0.3% of its $1.6 billion U.S. ad budget in 2019 on Black-owned media.
In May 2021, McDonald’s pledged to boost national ad spending with Black-owned media to 5% from 2% by 2024.
Olguin dismissed an earlier version of Allen’s lawsuit last November, finding no proof of intentional and purposeful discrimination against his companies.
The case is Entertainment Studios Networks Inc et al v McDonald’s Corp, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 21-04972.
- Update: Hurricane Fiona Roars Toward Atlantic Canada as New Storm Threatens Florida
- Stoplight Shooting Not Covered by Uninsured Motorist Policy, Carolina High Court Says
- Markets/Coverages: Travelers, Google Cloud to Build Data System to Underwrite Commercial Risk
- Big ‘I’ and Reagan Consulting Release 2022 Best Practices Study Results