How Americans Feel About Social Media Content Liability, Moderation
The debate over online content moderation, already in the spotlight during the COVID-19 pandemic and run-up to the U.S. election, has intensified in recent weeks as Twitter Inc and Facebook Inc diverged on how to handle inflammatory posts by President Donald Trump.
Here are some key poll findings:
WHAT SHOULD BE ALLOWED?
The new poll found nearly two-thirds of Americans favor letting people express their views on social media, including views that are offensive.
However, 85% of respondents favored removing intentionally false or misleading health information and 81% supported removing intentionally misleading claims about elections or other political issues.
Respondents were more critical of companies doing too little than too much in policing harmful content. Seventy-one percent of Democrats and 54% of independents thought companies were not tough enough, whereas Republicans were more divided.
WHO SHOULD MAKE THE RULES?
Eight in 10 respondents said they do not trust Big Tech to make the right decisions on content. Most preferred companies making these rules over the government, though a slim majority of Democrats favored the government setting content limits or guidance.
Respondents tended to prefer the idea of having independent content oversight boards to govern policies, with 81% saying such boards were a good idea. Facebook is in the process of setting up an oversight board, which will hear a small number of content cases and can make policy recommendations.
KEEP KEY INTERNET LAW?
Almost two-thirds of respondents said they supported in principle the law that shields major internet companies from liability for users’ content, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which Trump and many lawmakers are pushing to pare back.
(Reporting by Elizabeth Culliford in Birmingham, England Editing by Greg Mitchell and Matthew Lewis)