Greenberg Denied Bid to Dismiss New York AG Fraud Suit
The court found that the New York attorney general’s claim for Greenberg to disgorge millions of dollars in allegedly ill-gotten bonuses was “legally viable.”
Greenberg, 89, and his co-defendant, former AIG Chief Financial Officer Howard Smith, who also faces the claim, are accused of orchestrating sham transactions at the insurer.
The defendants failed to show the lack of incentive compensation resulting from the sham transactions at AIG, the Appellate Division, First Department ruled.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who is pursuing the lawsuit initially brought by his predecessor, Eliot Spitzer, also seeks to ban the defendants from the securities industry and from serving as officers or directors of public companies.
- Cleaning Crew Killed by Amazon Plane Was Wrapping up Shift at Demanding Job
- 25 Years Later: IJ’s Past and Continued Coverage of the Insurance Impact of 9/11
- Ryan Files Protest Over Clearinghouse Contract Awarded to Brown & Brown Firm
- Lawmakers Call for New AI Rules After Anthropic Researchers’ Safety Warnings