Court Certifies Gender Bias Class Action Against Costco
Three women plaintiffs say Costco’s promotion system has a disparate impact on women employees who seek advancement to general manager and assistant general manager. A different judge had allowed the case to proceed as a class action against the warehouse club operator in 2007.
However, last year a federal appeals court ordered that the decision be reconsidered, in light of a key U.S. Supreme Court ruling which had derailed a nationwide class action against Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
In his order on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen in San Francisco federal court said the Costco class claims differ from those in the Wal-Mart case in “several material ways.” For example, the size of the Costco class is a “mere fraction” of the proposed Wal-Mart case: approximately 700 people as opposed to 1.5 million, Chen wrote.
Representatives for Costco and the plaintiffs could not immediately be reached for comment.
The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California is Shirley “Rae” Ellis et al. vs. Costco Wholesale Corporation, No.04-3341.
- Home Insurance Tops Property Taxes in Squeeze for US Households
- How Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk, Coverage
- Florida AG Says His Office Investigating ‘Anti-Public Adjuster’ Endorsements in Policies
- World’s Largest Retirement Community Set to Borrow $180 Million for More Homes