Judge OKs $440K Settlement in South Dakota Forced Catheterization Suit
A federal judge has approved legal settlements totaling $440,000 for people in South Dakota who were subjected to forced catheterizations to check for drug use.
U.S. District Judge Roberto Lange ruled in April that police who used forced catheterizations violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. The lawsuit named the state Highway Patrol, individual officers, and the cities and police departments of Wagner, Pierre and Sisseton.
The ACLU of South Dakota and a Rapid City lawyer filed the case on behalf of people suspected of drug use who were subjected to forced catheterizations to obtain urine samples. Police had obtained search warrants for the urine samples.
Lange wrote in a 106-page opinion that the practice to prove low-level drug crimes was “a highly invasive — and in these cases — degrading medical procedure.”
Five people were awarded settlements between $75,000 and $99,000 for damages and legal costs.
- 10 Highest Class-Action Settlements in 2025 Eclipsed $70B Total: Duane Morris
- Adjusters Launch ‘CarFax for Insurance Claims’ to Vet Carriers’ Damage Estimates
- New York Governor Hochul Vows to Tackle Insurance Affordability, Litigation and Fraud
- Experian: AI Agents Could Overtake Human Error as Major Cause of Data Breaches