China Responds to UK Claims; Says It’s ‘Sowing Discord’ in Climate Talks
The sharp words came from Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu, who said on Tuesday that the accusations were a scheme to sow discord among developing countries.
The controversy is the latest baring of diplomatic bad blood after the talks in Copenhagen ended on Saturday with a broad, non-binding accord that fell short of hopes for a robust global agreement on how to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Jiang was responding to a report in Britain’s Guardian newspaper that said the Environment Minister Ed Miliband had accused China, Sudan, Bolivia and other left-wing Latin American nations of thwarting efforts to reach deeper agreement on how to fight global warming.
In a separate commentary for the paper, Miliband said China had “vetoed” a widely supported proposal at the Copenhagen talks to aim to cut global greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent by 2050.
The spokeswoman Jiang did not criticize Miliband by name, but China’s ire was clear. “The statements from certain British politicians are plainly a political scheme,” she said in a statement issued by the official Xinhua news agency.
“Their objective is to shirk responsibilities that should be assumed towards developing countries, and to provoke discord among developing countries. This scheme will come to nothing.”
The flap over Miliband’s reported comments is unlikely to seriously disrupt negotiations seeking to turn the Copenhagen accord into a detailed and legally binding treaty.
But the angry exchange has underscored the distrust between China and rich countries that could frustrate efforts to agree on that treaty by late 2010.
China is the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases from human activities and its biggest developing economy. Other governments have pressed China to do more to reduce its growing emissions and to submit its emissions goals to international checks as part of any new climate pact.
But China and other big developing countries have accused the rich economies of failing to offer big enough cuts to their emissions, and of not offering enough money and technological help to poor countries to cope with climate change.
Chinese experts have also said that the goal of cutting global greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent by 2050 is empty rhetoric without those commitments from rich nations.