Maryland Lawmakers Seek Compromise on Dog Bite Legislation
A new bill from Maryland’s state Senate would hold the state’s dog owners liable when their dogs bite “innocent victims,” but would also relieve owners who prove they couldn’t know their dogs were dangerous.
This marks the Maryland General Assembly’s third consecutive attempt to revise its dog-bite policy. It aims for a compromise between the strict liability bills favored by the Senate and more lenient ones approved by the House.
On a Leash: Dog Bite Insurance Claim Trends
However, Sen. Robert Zirkin, a Baltimore County Democrat who litigates dog-bite cases on behalf of plaintiffs, argued on Feb. 6 that the new bill leaves the burden solely on victims to prove the dogs were violent. He said it amounts to a “one free bite” policy.
Zirkin has introduced a counter-proposal, Senate Bill 286, that closely resembles the bill the House of Delegates rejected last year.
Related Articles
Neither Rain Nor Sleet But Dog Bites: Post Office Workers’ Injury Claims
Maryland Dog Bite Liability Measure Fails in House
- Florida Governor Signs Bill Dropping Building Permits for Work Valued at $7,500 or Less
- For Carriers, AI Can Now Mean Hyper-Personalized Customer Service, Leaders Say
- Alex Murdaugh’s Murder Conviction Tossed on Clerk Interference
- The Big Dog Is Off the Tech Porch: State Farm as ‘Next Gen Good Neighbor’