COURT SAYS NO DOUBLE-DIPPING
The Amarillo Court of Appeals upheld a law preventing injured workers from collecting benefits for a work-related injury from two different sources. According to the Texas Mutual Insurance Company, the court ruled that a Houston man who settled out of court with his employer over an on-the-job injury is not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Glen Everett allegedly suffered injuries to his left arm and wrist while working for The Finished Touch, a general contracting company in Houston. Everett filed a negligence suit against The Finished Touch, but later dropped it and filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits from Texas Mutual, which disputed the claim. Before the parties could resolve the claim, Everett settled with The Finished Touch for $37,500.00. He later decided to re-file his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Texas Mutual denied Everett’s claim, arguing that under the election of remedies law, he was not entitled to benefits because he received compensation for his injuries through the settlement. The Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (TWCC) disagreed, and ordered Texas Mutual to pay benefits to Everett. When the 127th District Court of Harris County reversed TWCC’s decision, Everett did not appeal, but TWCC did. Because the Houston Court of Appeals was overloaded with cases, the appeal was transferred to Amarillo. TWCC has filed for a rehearing.
- Maryland Announces $2.5 Billion Settlement Over Baltimore Bridge Collapse
- Florida Governor Signs Bill Dropping Building Permits for Work Valued at $7,500 or Less
- Uber and FedEx Get Green Light for Racketeering Suit Against Lawyers, Doctors
- The Big Dog Is Off the Tech Porch: State Farm as ‘Next Gen Good Neighbor’