News Currents

The co-worker and the shop foreman testified that McIntosh didn’t appear to be impaired by marijuana use before the accident.

Tenn. court: marijuana not a factor in worker’s injury

The Tennessee Supreme Court has ruled that a worker whose hand was crushed by machinery at his workplace was not to blame for the accident despite his admitted marijuana use off the job.

Billy McIntosh was injured in 2004 while working for Interstate Mechanical Contractors Inc. in Knoxville when his left hand got caught in a power roller machine.

McIntosh, who was 51 at the time he was injured, testified that while showing a new employee how to use the machine, he reached over it to set a piece of metal when the new employee engaged the rollers, which then grabbed McIntosh’s hand and pulled it into the rollers.

The co-worker was unable to help so McIntosh was forced to disengage the machine himself and then reverse the rollers to release his hand.

Doctors were forced to partially amputate his middle and index fingers, and McIntosh still cannot extend his fingers.

At the hospital, McIntosh tested positive for marijuana. He admitted he smoked it in the week leading up to and on the night before his injury but denied smoking it or being impaired the day of the accident.

Interstate Mechanical filed a petition in Chancery Court for Knox County alleging McIntosh violated its drug-free workplace policy and should be denied worker’s compensation. The state law establishing the drug-free workplace program presumes that any injuries to an employee found to have been using drugs or alcohol were caused by the drug use. But the court noted that the law also allows employees to enter evidence to rebut that presumption.

A medical toxicologist testified “that the level of THC in McIntosh’s system at the time of the injury would have impaired his reaction time.”

The co-worker and the shop foreman testified that McIntosh didn’t appear to be impaired by marijuana use before the accident.

McIntosh contended the injury was caused by the actions of an inexperienced employee.

The trial court ruled in favor of McIntosh and the state Supreme Court upheld. “In this case, the undisputed evidence … was that there would be no time to react if a person had a hand next to a roller when it was engaged,” Justice William M. Barker wrote.

“The rollers immediately grabbed McIntosh’s hand. McIntosh had no time to react,” said his lawyer.