Colorado Couple Will Get $50K After Dog Housing Lawsuit
The U.S. attorney’s office has ordered a Colorado homeowner’s association to pay $50,000 to a couple after they violated the Fair Housing Act by failing to allow a woman to stay in the complex with her emotional support dog.
A judge approved a consent order resolving the dispute between Creekside Condominium Homeowner’s Association and Creekside owner Jason Neilson and his partner Kirsten Swick.
The argument was over whether Swick’s emotional support dog met the association’s criteria for reasonable accommodation against its no-dogs policy, officials said.
The order also requires the association to also participate in Fair Housing Act training and adopt new accommodation and animal assistance policies and guidelines, court officials said.
The violation started when Neilson and Swick sent a letter in 2016 from a physician to the board stating Swick needed an emotional support dog as part of her treatment for depression and anxiety, officials said.
According to court documents, Swick was denied reasonable accommodation, even after providing further documentation as requested by the board. When attorneys threatened to sue, the board reversed their decision and granted Swick’s request, documents said.
The homeowner’s association board had no comment, as board protocol requires its members to meet as a whole before issuing any statement.
Neilson and Swick could not be reached for comment.
- KCC Says Isaias Insured Losses to Be $3 Billion; AM Best Calls Storm an Earnings Event
- Broad AI Exclusions in Insurance Policies Could Create Uncertainty, Marsh CEO Says
- Cyber Rates Are Down, Risks Are Up but Small Businesses Slow to Adopt
- All in the Family: Husband, Wife and Daughter Indicted for Insurance Fraud and Bribery