Workers’ Comp Line Achieves ‘Significant’ Profit in 2015: Fitch
The U.S. workers’ compensation insurance market achieved a “significant” underwriting profit in 2015, but trends call into question whether such a result can be repeated, Fitch Ratings concluded in a new report.
For 2015, the workers’ compensation combined ratio came in at 95.4. That is a remarkable improvement compared to 2011 through 2014, when the sector’s combined ratio was 117.3, 110.3, 103.1 and 102.4, respectively, according to SNL Financial data cited in the Fitch report.
“Calendar-year 2015 represents the culmination of a complete turnaround for the workers’ compensation line,” the Fitch report stated, crediting the good results to factors “including strong premium revenue growth from better pricing and economic factors, favorable loss cost trends, and favorable loss reserve experience tied to more conservative reserving practices.”
Fitch also noted that aside from a brief recession-era spike, workers’ comp claims generally trended downward in recent years due to “the evolution of better risk management and employee safety practices.”
Workers’ compensation as a sector even enjoyed favorable reserve development in 2015, with greater reserves helping to boost segment underwriting results for the past four years. This was important in 2015, with a boost in reserves helping to decrease the calendar year loss ratio by more than 5 percentage points, Fitch said.
Fitch suggests that the successes achieved by the U.S. workers’ compensation industry in 2015 may represent a cyclical peak.
One reason: Success in workers’ comp underwriting, plus large levels of capital for insurers, is spurring greater price competition. Premium rates declined for five consecutive quarters and this should continue through 2016, Fitch said.
Revenue growth has also tapered down. Written premium volume produced an average growth rate of about 7 percent from 2012 through 2014. That decreased to 3.5 percent in 2015, and Fitch warned that payroll exposure growth from job and wage expansion will be a factor that determines whether revenue growth can offset declining prices.
Moving ahead, Fitch also expects some profit deterioration, with an underwriting loss likely in 2017 and beyond due largely to competitive pressures. Fitch projects a workers’ compensation industry combined ratio of 98 for 2016. Fitch said that weaker investment contributions to earnings is spurring less aggressive underwriting and pricing.
Travelers Companies scored as the top workers’ compensation writer in 2015 in terms of direct written premium (nearly $4.47 billion with an 8.2 percent market share), and net written premiums (almost $3.96 billion and an 8.7 percent market share).
Hartford Fire Group (part of Hartford) came in second in terms of direct written premiums ($3.3 billion, 6.1 percent market share) and net written premiums ($3.1 billion, 6.9 percent market share).
Former market leaders AIG and Liberty Mutual Group have pulled back from the market somewhat, and their results reflect accordingly.
AIG is now the fifth most popular workers’ compensation writer in terms of direct written premium, with $2.56 billion in premium and a 4.7 percent market share. For this category, Liberty Mutual placed seventh, with $2.48 billion in direct written premiums and a 4.5 percent market share.
In terms of workers’ compensation net written premiums, AIG is in third place for 2015. The insurer booked $2.3 billion in net written premiums and carved out a 5.2 percent market share. Liberty Mutual placed fifth, with $2 billion in net written premiums and a 4.4 percent market share.
Worth noting: While AmTrust Financial Services places fourth on the list of top workers’ comp writers in terms of direct written premiums ($2.7 billion, 5.2 percent market share), it lands in 13th place in terms of net written premiums ($1 billion, 2.2 percent market share). Similarly, Zurich comes in third place regarding direct written premium ($2.86 billion, 5.2 percent market share), it is in slot number 14 for net written premiums ($998 million, 2.2 percent market share).