Judge in California Approves Lyft’s $27M Driver Settlement Deal
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco previously rejected a $12.25 million deal as too small.
Lyft and larger rival Uber are attempting to resolve lawsuits by drivers who contend they should be classified as employees and therefore be entitled to reimbursement for expenses, including gasoline and vehicle maintenance. Drivers currently pay those costs themselves.
The profits and valuations of so-called on-demand technology companies would be affected by a determination that these workers are employees.
Chhabria had said the previous Lyft deal “short-changed” drivers because it represented only 9 percent of the potential value of drivers’ reimbursement claims. The new deal represents roughly 17 percent.
In a statement, Lyft said it was pleased with the ruling, adding that the deal will preserve the flexibility of its drivers. Shannon Liss-Riordan, an attorney for drivers, said she was pleased with the order.
Chhabria will likely set a hearing for later this year to consider final approval.
Uber has agreed to settle a similar suit involving California and Massachusetts drivers in a deal worth up to $100 million. That agreement is under review by a different federal judge.
Reporting by Levine; Editing by Leslie Adler.
- Blacks and Hispanics Pay More for Auto Insurance. Study Tries to Answer Why.
- Global Non-Life Insurance Rates ‘Plateauing’ but Nat Cat Losses Delay Market Softening
- CIAB: All Commercial Lines See Lower Q3 Premium Increases Except Umbrella
- Arbitration Claims Against LNG Exporter Venture Global Reach Close to $6 Billion