Ohio AG accuses U.S. companies of making, selling lead paint

April 23, 2007 by

Ohio’s attorney general filed suit against 10 major U.S. chemical companies and paint makers, accusing them of continuing to make and sell lead paint while knowing it presented health hazards.

State Attorney General Marc Dann sued 10 companies, including Sherwin-Williams and DuPont, to ensure the state maintains the right to seek damages.

“Because lead is hazardous or toxic, at all relevant times the defendants were under a duty to exercise the highest degree of care that skill and foresight can attain,” said the lawsuit.

The U.S. government banned lead paint in 1978, but it still turns up in older buildings. Lead in the bloodstream can cause neurological damage and learning disabilities, especially in children.

Dann wants the companies declared in violation of the state’s public nuisance law.

The companies say the lawsuit is a distraction from efforts to fight problems related to lead paint.

Rhode Island became the first state to sue paint manufacturers in 1999, and last year, a jury there found three of the companies — Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries and Millennium Holdings — liable for creating a public nuisance. Analysts have predicted cleanup costs could reach into the billions of dollars, and the companies have appealed the jury’s verdict to the state Supreme Court.

In many cases, companies stopped producing lead paint decades ago and have addressed the issue responsibly, said Bonnie Campbell, a lawyer representing Sherwin Williams, Atlantic Richfield Co., Millennium Hold-ings LLC and NL Industries Inc.

The other companies named in the lawsuit are American Cyana-mid Co.; Armstrong Containers Inc.; Conagra Grocery Products Co., Cytec Industries Inc.; and Lyondell Chemical Co.

Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.